Studio light, simulated Spot light, simulated Worn, everyday room light, simulated Light return map, simulated Arrows, table up, simulated Hearts, table down, simulated Flash map, simulated

3D ray-traced simulation from certificate proportions. Not a photo of this stone. Accurate representation of optical performance, but it does not account for facet variations and does not show clarity or inclusions. See more.

1.02 ct D VVS2 Round Lab-Grown Diamond

$790.00

Exceptional98.3grade score
Carat
1.02
Colour
D
Clarity
VVS2
Cut
Ideal

Polish Excellent · Symmetry Excellent · Fluorescence None

Triple Excellent on the report. *Why this does not matter

Lab Report:

IGI LG813679975

Verify at IGI

Details
Report
IGI LG813679975 · Verify at IGI
Placement
Balanced
Table
57.0%
Depth
61.5%
Crown
34.3°
Pavilion
40.8°
Measurements
6.47 – 6.49 × 3.99 mm
Growth
HPHT
Crown 34.3° and pavilion 40.8° are properly complementary. At a 57.0% table a 34.3° crown calls for 40.84° of pavilion and this stone delivers 40.8° — off by 0.04°. Light entering the crown is turned back through the table rather than leaking out of the pavilion. This is the one thing a round brilliant must get right, and it does. It sits on the locus Sasián et al. (2007) identified as the best-performing set, and that Cowing (2005) calls the axis of Excellent.

Brightness-leaning (lean 40/100). Whiter, more mirror-like return with less coloured flash. Reads well in diffuse everyday light and photographs cleanly — which matters if it sells from images.

From the certificate text: comments state As Grown — no indication of post-growth treatment.

Top tier — score 98.3. The geometry is as strong as certificate numbers can show: crown and pavilion in proper complement, the table where it belongs. This is the standard haus1919 curates to, and this stone clears it with room to spare. What remains — inclusion position and optical symmetry — is confirmed on the actual stone, which no certificate can show.

The score, Pass and Fail are our own assessment of the proportions printed on the laboratory report. They are not a laboratory grade. The report itself is the laboratory's; the link above opens it on the laboratory's own site. Questions and method.

More stones